<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Daily quote by Iran-Iraq War</title>
    <link>https://t.inks.page/wiki/Iran-Iraq_War</link>
    <atom:link href="https://t.inks.page/wiki/Iran-Iraq_War/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Follow any website on Inks</description>
    <generator>inks.page</generator>
    <item>
<title>2026-04-05</title>
<link>https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Iran-Iraq_War?t=2026-04-05</link>
<description><![CDATA[<li>The tension between these conflicting aims is perhaps particularly acute in the late <a href="/wiki/20th_century" title="20th century">twentieth century</a> because of the publicity given to the existence of various alternative “models” for emulation. On the one hand, there are the extremely successful “trading states”—chiefly in <a href="/wiki/Asia" title="Asia">Asia</a>, like <a href="/wiki/Japan" title="Japan">Japan</a> and <a href="/wiki/British_Hong_Kong" title="British Hong Kong">Hong Kong</a>, but also including <a href="/wiki/Switzerland" title="Switzerland">Switzerland</a>, <a href="/wiki/Sweden" title="Sweden">Sweden</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Austria" title="Austria">Austria</a>—which have taken advantage of the great <a href="/wiki/Economic_growth" title="Economic growth">growth in world production</a> and in <a href="/wiki/Globalization" title="Globalization">commercial interdependence</a> since 1945, and whose external policy emphasizes peaceful, trading relations with other societies. In consequence, they have all sought to keep defense spending as low as is compatible with the preservation of national <a href="/wiki/Sovereignty" title="Sovereignty">sovereignty</a>, thereby freeing resources for high domestic <a href="/wiki/Consumption_(economics)" title="Consumption (economics)">consumption</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_investment" class="extiw" title="wikipedia:Capital investment">capital investment</a>. On the other hand, there are the various “militarized” economies—<a href="/wiki/Vietnam" title="Vietnam">Vietnam</a> in <a href="/wiki/Southeast_Asia" class="mw-redirect" title="Southeast Asia">Southeast Asia</a>, Iran and Iraq as they engage in their lengthy war, <a href="/wiki/Israel" title="Israel">Israel</a> and <a href="/wiki/Arab_world" class="mw-redirect" title="Arab world">its jealous neighbors</a> in the <a href="/wiki/Near_East" title="Near East">Near East</a>, and the <a href="/wiki/Soviet_Union" title="Soviet Union">USSR</a> itself—all of which allocate more (in some cases, much more) than 10 percent of their <a href="/wiki/Gross_National_Product" title="Gross National Product">GNP</a> to defense expenditures each year and, while firmly believing that such levels of <a href="/wiki/Government_spending" title="Government spending">spending</a> are necessary to guarantee <a href="/wiki/National_security" title="National security">military security</a>, manifestly suffer from that diversion of resources from productive, peaceful ends. Between the two poles of the merchant and the warrior states, so to speak, there lie most of the rest of the <a href="/wiki/Nations" title="Nations">nations</a> of <a href="/wiki/Earth" title="Earth">this planet</a>, not convinced that the world is a safe enough place to allow them to reduce arms expenditure to Japan’s unusually low level, but also generally uneasy at the high economic and social costs of large-scale spending upon armaments, and aware that there is a certain trade-off between short-term military security and long-term economic security.
<ul><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Kennedy" class="extiw" title="wikipedia:Paul Kennedy">Paul Kennedy</a>, <i>The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500-2000</i> (1987)</li></ul></li>]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

  </channel>
</rss>
